2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2011 Dodge Journey
To start off, 2011 Dodge Journey is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Journey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Dodge Journey (283 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Journey should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5.
Because 2011 Dodge Journey is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Dodge Journey will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Dodge Journey (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (314 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Dodge Journey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C5 | 2011 Dodge Journey | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | C5 | Journey |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 283 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6350 RPM |
| Torque | 314 Nm | 352 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4887 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2891 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 78 L |
