2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C5 weights approximately 116 kg more than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (115 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C5 | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Citroen | Honda |
| Model | C5 | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2436 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.3 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 40 L |
