2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2011 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2011 Nissan Cube is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Cube (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (57 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C5 weights approximately 109 kg more than 2011 Nissan Cube.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Cube (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (110 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 2011 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C5 | Cube |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1301 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.1 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.9 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |