2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2011 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2011 Nissan Rogue is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (131 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C5 (314 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 2011 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C5 | Rogue |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 314 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1801 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1659 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.9 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |