2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1130 kg more than 2000 Citroen C5.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C5 | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Citroen | Fisker |
| Model | C5 | Karma |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 36 L |
