2000 Citroen Saxo vs. 1956 Fiat Campagnola
To start off, 2000 Citroen Saxo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Saxo (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (36 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1956 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen Saxo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Fiat Campagnola (122 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1956 Fiat Campagnola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Saxo | 1956 Fiat Campagnola | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | Saxo | Campagnola |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1910 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 20.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2260 mm |