2000 Citroen Saxo vs. 1956 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Citroen Saxo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Simca Aronde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Simca Aronde (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Saxo. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Simca Aronde should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Saxo.
Because 1956 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Simca Aronde (90 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm). This means 1956 Simca Aronde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Saxo | 1956 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Citroen | Simca |
Model | Saxo | Aronde |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 90 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2450 mm |