2000 Citroen Saxo vs. 1968 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2000 Citroen Saxo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (81 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Saxo. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 490 kg more than 2000 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1968 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Saxo | 1968 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
| Model | Saxo | Bellel |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 40 L |
