2000 Citroen Saxo vs. 1995 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2000 Citroen Saxo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Saxo. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1195 kg more than 2000 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen Saxo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Saxo | 1995 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Citroen | Mahindra |
Model | Saxo | Armada |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4310 mm |