2000 Citroen Xanae vs. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xanae is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (58 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xanae. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xanae weights approximately 119 kg more than 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4.
Because 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xanae, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xanae | 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | Xanae | Dove GTR4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2138 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2140 mm |