2000 Citroen Xanae vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xanae is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xanae is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xanae (58 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xanae should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xanae weights approximately 309 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xanae (142 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 2000 Citroen Xanae will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xanae | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Citroen | MG |
Model | Xanae | 1100 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |