2000 Citroen Xanae vs. 1964 MG MGC
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xanae is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 MG MGC (149 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (58 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xanae.
Because 1964 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xanae, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 MG MGC (174 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (142 Nm). This means 1964 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xanae.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xanae | 1964 MG MGC | |
| Make | Citroen | MG |
| Model | Xanae | MGC |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2912 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
