2000 Citroen Xanae vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xanae is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xanae is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xanae weights approximately 559 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xanae, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xanae (142 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm). This means 2000 Citroen Xanae will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xanae | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Citroen | Seat |
| Model | Xanae | 600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2010 mm |
