2000 Citroen Xanae vs. 1992 Holden Barina
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xanae is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Barina would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xanae is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Barina (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (58 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Barina should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xanae. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xanae weights approximately 348 kg more than 1992 Holden Barina.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xanae (142 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Barina. (102 Nm). This means 2000 Citroen Xanae will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xanae | 1992 Holden Barina | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | Xanae | Barina |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |