2000 Citroen Xanae vs. 1994 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xanae is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Plymouth Colt (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (58 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xanae. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Plymouth Colt weights approximately 91 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xanae. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Plymouth Colt (157 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (142 Nm). This means 1994 Plymouth Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xanae.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xanae | 1994 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Citroen | Plymouth |
| Model | Xanae | Colt |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1834 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |
