2000 Citroen Xanae vs. 2006 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Defender is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xanae. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xanae would be higher. At 2,498 cc, 2006 Land Rover Defender is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 270 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xanae.
Because 2006 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen Xanae. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Defender (300 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xanae. (142 Nm). This means 2006 Land Rover Defender will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xanae.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xanae | 2006 Land Rover Defender | |
| Make | Citroen | Land Rover |
| Model | Xanae | Defender |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2498 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 89 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
