2000 Citroen Xantia vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xantia is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xantia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xantia weights approximately 670 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xantia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xantia (153 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xantia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xantia | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | Xantia | 600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 767 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 153 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |