2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Because 1958 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Xsara | 12 M |
Year Released | 2000 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1868 cc | 1170 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2500 mm |