2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1961 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 DKW Munga weights approximately 12 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 1961 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Citroen | DKW |
| Model | Xsara | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1104 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 31 L |
