2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 746 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | Xsara | Fronte |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1246 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |