2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 666 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
| Model | Xsara | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1166 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |
