2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 655 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | Xsara | Fronte |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |