2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 610 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | Xsara | Fronte |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1868 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |