2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1969 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (72 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1969 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1969 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 225 kg more than 1969 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Zastava 850 K is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Zastava 850 K. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 1969 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | Xsara | 850 K |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 846 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2010 mm |
