2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1970 Mazda 616
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1970 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1970 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 256 kg more than 1970 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1970 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | 616 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1970 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1166 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |