2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2

To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 237 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.

Because 1974 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen Xsara 1974 Mazda RX-2
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara RX-2
Year Released 2000 1974
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 2292 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 108 HP 119 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 157 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1197 kg 960 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2480 mm