2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1976 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 206 kg more than 1976 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1300.

Compare all specifications: