2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1978 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1978 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 248 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (217 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | 616 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |