2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1978 Volvo 164

To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (91 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xsara.

Because 1978 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (217 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 164. (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 164.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen Xsara 1978 Volvo 164
Make Citroen Volvo
Model Xsara 164
Year Released 2000 1978
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 2998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 91 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 217 Nm 204 Nm
Torque RPM 1900 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 5610 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3350 mm