2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 261 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 323. (116 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Xsara | 323 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 80 mm |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1141 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |
