2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 24 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | Xsara | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1951 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1166 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2530 mm |
