2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 476 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (140 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | Xsara | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1246 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2160 mm |
