2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 391 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | Xsara | 102 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1141 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2160 mm |