2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1983 Skoda L
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1983 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 341 kg more than 1983 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 1983 Skoda L | |
| Make | Citroen | Skoda |
| Model | Xsara | L |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1046 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1166 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |
