2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1986 Lancia ECV
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Lancia ECV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Lancia ECV would be higher. At 1,757 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Lancia ECV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Lancia ECV (600 HP) has 492 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1986 Lancia ECV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Lancia ECV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1986 Lancia ECV | |
Make | Citroen | Lancia |
Model | Xsara | ECV |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1757 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 600 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |