2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1989 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1989 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1989 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 175 kg more than 1989 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (190 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Mazda 323. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1989 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | 323 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1324 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 50 L |