2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1989 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1989 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Xsara | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1910 mm |