2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1996 Nissan Gloria
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Gloria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Gloria would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Gloria is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Gloria weights approximately 370 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1996 Nissan Gloria is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Nissan Gloria. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 1996 Nissan Gloria | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Xsara | Gloria |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |