2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1996 Proton 400

To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (89 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 66 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (126 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen Xsara 1996 Proton 400
Make Citroen Proton
Model Xsara 400
Year Released 2000 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 1466 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 148 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1141 kg 1075 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2510 mm