2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 1998 Isuzu VX-02
To start off, 2000 Citroen Xsara is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Isuzu VX-02. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Isuzu VX-02 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Isuzu VX-02 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Isuzu VX-02 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Isuzu VX-02 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Isuzu VX-02 has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Isuzu VX-02 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 1998 Isuzu VX-02 | |
| Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
| Model | Xsara | VX-02 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1868 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
