2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2001 Volvo Hatric
To start off, 2001 Volvo Hatric is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 2,442 cc, 2001 Volvo Hatric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo Hatric (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo Hatric should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo Hatric weights approximately 310 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo Hatric (280 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (148 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo Hatric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xsara. 2001 Volvo Hatric has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo Hatric will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 2001 Volvo Hatric | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Xsara | Hatric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2442 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1141 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 68 L |
