2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2002 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 36 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | Xsara | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1134 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1450 mm |
