2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 108 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 279 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda 3 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen Xsara 2004 Mazda 3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara 3
Year Released 2000 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 1558 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 148 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1750 RPM
Top Speed 195 km/hour 185 km/hour
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1141 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2430 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 55 L