2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 570 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (193 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Xsara | Megane |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1770 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |