2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2006 Mazda 3

To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 37 kg more than 2006 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen Xsara 2006 Mazda 3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara 3
Year Released 2000 2006
Body Type Hatchback Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 105 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.6 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 83.6 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1166 kg 1129 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2650 mm