2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2008 Mazda 3

To start off, 2008 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2008 Mazda 3. (83 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda 3 weights approximately 21 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda 3. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen Xsara 2008 Mazda 3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model Xsara 3
Year Released 2000 2008
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1586 cc 1349 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 124 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3500 RPM
Top Speed 197 km/hour 164 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 10.9 seconds 14.3 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1134 kg 1155 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2650 mm