2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2008 Volvo C30

To start off, 2008 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2008 Volvo C30. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C30 weights approximately 113 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C30 (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xsara.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Citroen Xsara 2008 Volvo C30
Make Citroen Volvo
Model Xsara C30
Year Released 2000 2008
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 1595 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 99 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 147 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.6 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 81.4 mm
Acceleration 0-100mph 11.2 seconds 11.8 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1166 kg 1279 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4260 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2650 mm