2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (128 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xsara. 2009 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2000 Citroen Xsara has manual transmission. 2000 Citroen Xsara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | Xsara | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1868 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 128 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |