2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2010 Dacia Logan
To start off, 2010 Dacia Logan is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Dacia Logan. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2010 Dacia Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dacia Logan weights approximately 170 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dacia Logan (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Dacia Logan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen Xsara | 2010 Dacia Logan | |
Make | Citroen | Dacia |
Model | Xsara | Logan |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1868 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2910 mm |