2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1402 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Citroen | Fisker |
| Model | Xsara | Karma |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1138 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 36 L |
